/int/ - International

what?
about a some south america stuff?

>>9980
there are documents of aztecs talking and documenting war between conquistadors and spaniards

these are drawings they made though

>>9981
honestly
i am not sure what to say
Flora is probably knows more since she is from south america

>>9982
well no i am talking about historical documentations
i like reading this stuff like how they thought about white people and etc
it is interesting because how can a person think when they literally sacrifice fucking children unhinged yet complain and play victim when spaniards came its so freakin' ironic

>>9983
i am neutral
child sacrifice was rare and overexaggerated
Spanish did somewhat bring some good into South America but they also mass killed people and destroyed cultures and languages sadly

>>9984
how was it rare
it was systematic
they did it every year
and itwas form of humilation to other tribes
they would be destined to be sacrificed since birth
it wasnt something that was jsut "rare" like a crime it was legal

imagine if a turk came to slavic city and said "well we need like 1000 babies from here to be killed" and you needed to teach them to be sacrifices since birth
i mean you already know about janesseries

>Scholars estimate anywhere from 10,000 to 80,000 people per year
how is that rare

Wikiepedia is not a valid source and no one will ever know how many people actually died there it impossible
>>9988
>>9985
child deaths are very common in the ancient era so to speak
here my point everything all religions all countires all idelogies did bad things
>>9986
the turks were similar to the spanish more that the aztec and they did ruin serbian culture with their loanwords sadly
>>9987

>>9989

>Wikiepedia is not a valid source
wikipedia uses what people wrote.

>>9989
>the turks were similar to the spanish more that the aztec
but genetically turks and aztecs are more similar both are (i am racist) asian.

not all religions did bad things
i dont want to say christians did bad things per se
its more of individual abuse
child sacrfifice was not okay in spain
also GET in 11 posts

>>9990
What people wrote is also not reliable too

>>9991
why do you defend aztec sacrifices?

the fact that it was norm is already an evidence
statistically if child sacrifice is considered an ok thing only for vassals "defeated tribes and cities" that means that it is a form of humilation and a form of malice.
so by that itself there is hardly reason they had a handicap
its not like they decided to sacrficie children solely because they were scared of gods
it was a means to demonstrate that aztecs were rulers of their land and that even their children are their property
that way its deducable that child sacrifices were vast
>they built a fucking 60 meter tall building for sacrificng at the center of their city that is also a place where the king is
>the king lives next to hundreds of skulls can you think this is overexaggerated?
https://www.science.org/do/10.1126/science.aau5404/full/700wideskullrow-1643733972873.jpg

>According to Aztec beliefs, Huitzilopochtli required regular nourishment (tlaxcaltiliztli) in the form of freshly harvested human hearts. https://qz.com/374994/aztec-sacrifice-was-real-and-its-not-fetishistic-to-be-fascinated-by-it

these is no debate here bro

>>9992
Why is child sacrifice bad?

>>9983
The Spaniards all descend from a group of people who killed everyone on the Iberian Peninsula.
Whites have been ruthlessly killing each other for millennia. Child sacrifice was not uncommon in their culture.
The Aztecs were practitioners of eugenics, and the arrival of the Spanish ruined the continent forever, making it impossible for anything good to develop here.

>>10022
>child sacrifice was not uncommon
???
just gonna ignore it child scarifice was uncommon in Europe
Europe is christian
Even before christianity child sacrifice was not popular
i see the point you made.
aztecs were practicioneers of eugenics but spaniards intermixed soiling their white blood with aztec so in sense of friendly altruism you're telling me about how sad that is from our side.

>>10029
This is simply not true. European paganism involved multiple forms of human sacrifice, even of infants. They only stopped because of Christianity, a foreign desert cult that also performed human sacrifice rituals on its beginnings. The difference is that nobody erased or revised their entire history. Nobody committed genocide against their entire race, using the justification they were savages. You even take pride in the fact that you descend from the Aryans.
The locals were the ones whose blood was soiled. The Europeans who came to this continent were from Europe's lower classes. While they murdered and maligned the local elites, they raped the local lower castes, who were righteously considered human cattle. This allowed them to multiply endlessly, also miscegenating with blacks Europeans brought from Africa.

>>10051
it is true
because it is red truth

Everything that is said in red is objective truth
Everything that is said in blue is opinion, or a theory
I claim that child sacrifices existed
You claim they don't and try to explain it as something that is normal or etc

Now then because i listen to dreamenddischarger I will destroy you.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RxVYYOBXYt8
>They only stopped because of Christianity
European paganism might have had weirdos around, but according to law of ROme and Greece child sacrifices were considered evil in ancient countries before christians
>a foreign desert cult that also performed human sacrifice rituals on its beginnings
There are almost no desserts in Europe, and back in bronze age Europe suffered from cold climate changes making it far harsher to inhabit
So, no, europeans did not have any significant huge desert cults as there were desserts in most areas where they lived at the time
Oh, and just because i hate shit like that jews did not perform child sacrifices at large, jews were against child sacrifices, jews thought child sacrifices as most immortal inhuman crimes to exist

>ou even take pride in the fact that you descend from the Aryans.
I just want to say I am Yamnayan I am not aryan, aryans refer to indo iranians

I am not an aryan, because I am not nazi.

sry i didnt read the rest

>>10052
>You claim they don't
Nope, i never claimed such a thing, you can know what replies are mine because of my flag, can't you?
>child sacrifices were considered evil in ancient countries before christians
Not true, why are you making things up? There is evidence both cultures performed human sacrifices, even of infants.
https:// www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110449242-003/html
https:// pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20726130/
>There are almost no desserts in Europe
I am saying Christianity is a desert cult, Christianity originated in the middle east, so the religion that made Europeans stop their human sacrifices doesn't even hail from Europe.
>jews were against child sacrifices
Even going with the official narrative there are sources that corroborate how they did actually perform human sacrifices, even of children.
https:// www.patheos.com/blogs/atheology/2015/11/the-legacy-of-child-sacrifice-in-early-judaism-and-christianity/