/pol/ - Politically Correct

the question is whether antisemitism is correlated to jewish population's success and expansion.

>>54205
>>54205
>Nazi propaganda portrayed Jews as a vast, exploitative “race” undermining Germany. In fact, Jews were a small fraction of the population with low birth rates compared to “Aryans”. There was no demographic foundation for their myth of threat.
> Nationalist regimes accused local Jews of dual loyalty or subversion. Yet Arab Jews were a tiny minority (e.g. <2% in most countries)​
>Most American antisemitism was a distortion: resentment toward an industrious minority rather than any real demographic competition. Indeed, Jewish immigrants quickly joined the middle class and intermarried, reducing separateness over generations
>but actual Jewish numbers remained small relative to host societies. Scholarly analyses emphasize that blaming Jewish growth or separateness was typically a scapegoating trope. Demographic data show that expulsions, violence, and legal restrictions generally preceded or accompanied population shifts (often forcing migration), rather than being a response to unchecked Jewish expansion

what this concludes is that jews were always a minority in each scenario, in a nutshell there was no event at the moment where jews were replacing other humans. However, a lot of jews leave their communities to follow more liberal lifestyle.

It's kind of interesting.

jewish population is always smaller every time.
I think it's interesting. Jews have rarely "expanded" aggressively outside their ghettos. If I was evil, I would want to increase myself and get more power, but jews do not actually increase themselves. they remained a small population after so many years anyway.

i want to ask chatgpt if there are "ghost jews" that dropped judaism maybe